Anew analysisof the Nov. 5 ballot measure aiming to eliminate state sales taxes on groceries projects state revenue losses ranging from $134 million to $646 million annually.
On Tuesday in Pierre, the Legislative Research Council presented the analysis to lawmakers on the state budget committee. Council employees provide research, analysis and administrative support to legislators.
Backers of the citizen-initiatedballot measureonly aim to prohibit state sales taxes on groceries, but the measure references items sold for human consumption. The wide range of potential revenue losses depends on how human consumption is interpreted.
This is why words matter, saidJeff Mehlhaff, the councils chief fiscal analyst.
A narrow interpretation limits the measures impact to groceries. A broader interpretation includes many goods and services used by people, based on definitions and interpretations of consume and consumption. Utilities, toiletries and car repairs are some examples cited by the council as goods and services technically consumed by humans.
The narrow definition would reduce state revenues by an estimated $133.6 million. The broader interpretation would result in an estimated revenue loss of up to $646.2 million. The statestotal annual budgetis $7.3 billion.
Acoalition formed to opposethe ballot measure says that in addition to affecting state sales taxes, the measure would affect city sales taxes, due to a state law that say cities cannot tax anything the state doesnt tax. Yet the actual language of themeasure says municipalities may continue to impose such taxes.
When asked about that, Mehlhaff said,Im just leaving that where it is because it says municipalities may continue to impose such taxes.
Rep. Tony Venhuizen, R-Sioux Falls, said voter passage of the measure could precipitate the worst budget cuts since the 10% across-the-board reductions during the 2011 legislative session.
If the people vote for this, they need to know that when we come during January, we are not going to be doing increases for anything, he said. Were going to make significant budget cuts.
Retailers such as Walmart, Sams Club and Dollar General, which classify a significant portion of their sales as groceries and consumables, could see a substantial portion of their sales untaxed under the new measure, according to the analysis. It estimates that 59% to 81% of sales at those retailers could be affected.
The analysis says the Legislature would need to clarify the definition of human consumption to determine the measures full fiscal impact, should the measure pass.
Proponent says LRC recommended language
Rick Weiland runs Dakotans for Health, the group behind the ballot measure. He said the measure initially said anything sold for eating or drinking by humans, but was changed to anything sold for human consumption because the Legislative Research Council recommended it.
A 2022letter to Weilandfrom the council suggested the initial wording was overly vague, inviting various interpretations in determining its meaning. The council recommended using terms like ingestion, chewing or consumed.
These terms seem to be more precise than eating and drinking, as they may better capture the various elements of food and beverage consumption,the council wroteto Weiland.
Following this advice, Weiland said, his team revised the language to anything sold for human consumption, except alcoholic beverages and prepared food.
Attorney General Marty Jackleyhas since statedthat human consumption is not defined by state law, and its common definition encompasses more than just food and drinks.
Weilands attorney sought clarification from Jackley in a February 2023letter and email, but said he received no response.
Mehlhaff told budget committee members that the language used in the final draft is not the councils recommendation, pointing toanother linein the 2022 letter that offered a possible rewrite: The retail sale of any food or food ingredient for any purpose is exempt from any tax imposed by law.
Mehlhaff said if the measure passes, lawmakers could attempt to amend or repeal it before its effective date on July 1, 2025.
South Dakota Searchlight provides free news and commentary on critical issues facing the state. We seek to serve the public interest with accuracy, fairness, insight and civility.
Were part ofStates Newsroom, the nations largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Leave a Reply